Monday, November 12, 2012

Gang rape of Mother India: Aseem Trivedi is right after all

With all the scams that have been tumbling out in India one after the other and the government’s blind rejection of any wrongdoing, it would perhaps be appropriate to acknowledge that Aseem Trivedi’s acerbic cartoon ‘The Gang Rape of Mother India’ has captured the spirit of the times. Perhaps, more effectively and certainly more forcefully than what could have been depicted by India’s most popular cartoonist, RK Laxman.

Juxtapose Trivedi’s cartoon with what happened last week and consider the merits of the case: the Manmohan Singh government’s inept handling of the black money issue raked up by activist-turned-politician Arvind Kejriwal, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) Vinod Rai’s observation about the appalling brazenness with which decisions were being taken by the government and the murkiness around the first family of Indian politics as exposed by Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy in the National Herald acquisition case. So far, the Congress has been unconvincing in its defence of making unsecured loans of Rs 90 crore to Rahul Gandhi’s firm, Young Indian.



Aseem Trivedi. PTI

When you put all the scams together, be it the unchecked flow of black money estimated at $462 billion, the Coalgate scam, the 2G spectrum scam, the Maharashtra irrigation scam, the Adarsh Housing Society scam and other such, the feeling that India is being raped and robbed by a nexus of corrupt politicians-bureaucrats-corporates-builders is unmistakable.

Whose vote will Kejriwal cut into, Congress or BJP?

The big question doing the rounds in Delhi’s political circles is who will Arvind Kejriwal damage more – the Congress or the BJP?

Prima facie, it seems like it is the Congress that is bearing the brunt of India Against Corruption’s anti-graft crusade, the latest target being no less than Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra.

But with the Delhi elections due next year, and with Kejriwal targeting that opportunity as his first test, the BJP reckons it has something to worry about. Minus Kejriwal, the BJP could have hoped to benefit from Sheila Dikshit’s anti-incumbency. Now, the game is open.


Arvind Kejriwal. PTI








This was evident in the Kejriwal-BJP tussle during the power tariff agitation, where Team Kejriwal’s white Aam Aadmi caps were in contrast to BJP’s black Bijli Andolan.Vijay Goel had a tough time convincing everyone that he had been spearheading the anti-power tariff struggle against Sheila Dikshit all this while.

Goel is, in fact, fighting two battles – one against the public perception that Kejriwal is the real fighter for aam aadmicauses like power tariffs, and the other to convince the BJP leadership that he is the man to take on Sheila Dikshit and lead the party in the 2013 Delhi campaign.

Goel had a faceoff with Kejriwal three days ago and is still feeling the sting. Kejriwal, who was invited to Goel’s anti-power tariff protest, used the opportunity to ask the BJP some uncomfortable questions on the power tariff hike. He achieved his purpose of putting both Congress and BJP in the same bucket.

All’s fair in love or politics, is not it? Goel felt offended when Firstpost asked him this. He fumed: “Kejirwal misused a gentleman’s courtesy extended by me. He came uninvited. It was our stage and our people. He requested me to let him speak for two minutes. I extended the courtesy because my fight is against the Sheila Dikshit government. Any support in this regard is welcome. Instead he blasted us. That’s not fair. He has entered Delhi politics only a few days back. I have demanded an apology from him. I am told that he has responded by saying that I was like an elder brother.”

During his agitation, Kejriwal reconnected the power lines of two people whose power had been cut due to non-payment of bills. Two FIRs have been filed against the persons whose lines Kejriwal connected, but one of them has since paid his dues while the other has not.

Quite clearly, the arrival of Kejriwal has forced both BJP and Congress to wonder who will lose more from his entry, but there is one point of convergence between the two: both blame the media for making Kejriwal a hero to the Delhi aam aadmi.

Party spokespersons believe that if the media stops treating Kejriwal like a celebrity, his fortunes will plummet.

The Congress MP from West Delhi, Mahabal Mishra, a migrant from Madhubani in Bihar, has risen up the ladder by winning three assembly elections and finally a Lok Sabha seat from the Punjabi-dominated constituency. He says: “Let the Delhi elections come, and his bubble will burst. Here the fight has always been a straight one between BJP and Congress. So many parties have tried to succeed in Delhi but none have succeeded. Kejriwal and party can at best cut into the anti-Congress votes, not into Congress votes.”

He shied away from directly saying that Kejriwal will eat into BJP votes and that this will ultimately help the Congress. Many Congress leaders are of the same opinion and believe that Kejriwal will cut into the BJP vote and let Sheila Dikshit win again.

There is also quiet talk about Kejriwal’s relationship with Sandeep Diskshit, Congress’s East Delhi MP and Sheila Dikshit’s son. Sandeep has an NGO background and played the part of an interlocutor during Anna Hazare’s second Jan Lokpal dharna.

A senior functionary of the Delhi BJP echoed similar sentiments on Kejriwal. “He is going to play the role of spoiler or, as they say, `Vote Katua’ in Bihar. For now it looks like he is going to make inroads into the votes that could have come to the BJP and help the Congress. But once the media stops playing him up the way it is doing now, the game will change.”

But a minority view in the BJP is that Kejriwal will help build up the anti-Congress mood and ultimately help the BJP. “There is a distinct possibility that he will help in creating an anti-Congress atmosphere in the city. But when it comes to voting the people will realise that his party is not in a position to win so they will vote for the party which can offer an alternate government – the BJP.”

Voters in Delhi have, on various occasions, proved their unpredictability. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh contested only one election in his lifetime and lost to the BJP’s VK Malhotra in Delhi. Singh’s poll managers had then blamed his loss on some rumors spread against him.

BJP veteran LK Advani managed to win a Delhi seat narrowly against Rajesh Khanna. He subsequently left Delhi for the safer Gandhinagar in Gujarat. Former Minister Jagmohan, who has been considered an able administrator, lost from New Delhi. A Bihari migrant, Mahabal Mishra, to the surprise of many in his own party, won comfortably from West Delhi in 2009.

It won’t be easy for Kejriwal to convert interest into votes since every party needs huge logistical support during campaigning and on polling day. By a rough estimate, one needs 5-7 persons at each polling booth. This means a political party requires, by conservative estimates, about 25,000 workers on polling day in the national capital. Will Kejriwal have that kind of numbers? But then, the reforms introduced by the Election Commission are helping reduce the number of party workers needed to be present at polling stations.

Will Kejriwal have the appetite to hijack the opposition space from the BJP in the long run, as he did the other day with Vijay Goel? The answer to his success in Delhi lies here. His Congress and BJP rivals cite those dwindling numbers at the Mumbai and Jantar Mantar rallies in December last year when Team Anna tried to relaunch the Jan Lokpal movement with yet another fast. This proved to them that Kejriwal without media support can’t muster the numbers.

But neither party is sure who will ultimately benefit from Kejriwal’s gatecrashing their party in Delhi.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

UPA wishes you a Very Happy Diwali


Government to gag CAG

In a move which might see opposition from various political parties and other bodies is on Governments idea to limit powers of the CAG.






















A gag order may be passed at the earliest. There has already been lot of sharp reactions from various people and bodies.

Arvind Kejriwal said the CAG appointments should be independent and neither the government nor the opposition must have a say in the selection process, BJP leader Venkaiah Naidu accused the UPA of trying to undermine the institution of CAG.

Kejriwal on Monday blamed the government of trying to weaken the CAG office, saying the UPA wants to make CAG their agent. "Government's intentions are not correct. When CAG was coming out with strong reports, government tried to suppress it. The politicians should not decide about the selection of members of the CAG. Even the Opposition should not have a say in the selection of CAG,” Kejriwal said.

IAC member Kumar Vishwas says he was threatened

Activist and close associate of activist turned politician Arvind Kejriwal, Kumar Vishwas has said that his life is in danger and said that apart from receiving threatening calls and emails, had a gang of 12 unidentified people who gathered outside his house on Sunday.




























Vishwas, who filed an FIR at the Indirapuram police station in Ghaziabad, said that he fears for his life and that he is being threatened, reported CNN-IBN.

Kumar Vishwas said that two persons had entered his house on Sunday. ibnlive

“I have been receiving threatening calls and emails for several days. Two men entered my house and said that they wanted to join the IAC,” Vishwas said.

Earlier, Manish Sisodia, another associate of Kejriwal, had alleged that he was being threatened.

Vishwas claimed that two men had allegedly entered Sisodia’s house and threatened his wife.

IAC has taken the issue seriously and had issued a press release alleging that some groups were trying to silence them, reported CNN-IBN.



Arvind Kejriwal not to use 'India Against Corruption' name after Nov 26, 2012

Arvind Kejriwal has said that his group will not use 'India Against Corruption' (IAC) as its name after the formation of his political party on November 26, a day after the veteran activist's group insisted that they would like to retain the name.

"Anna is too dear to us. I have deepest respects for him. After launch of our party on November 26, we will not use IAC name," Mr Kejriwal tweeted on Sunday.















Earlier in the day, the activist-turned-politician said he considers Mr Hazare as his "Guru" and talks to him everyday.

"If he asks me to stop using the IAC's name, I won't use it," Mr Kejriwal said when asked about Mr Hazare and his associates' claim that the name remains with them.

Meanwhile, activist Kiran Bedi told reporters that the name IAC will remain with Mr Hazare.

"We will seek donations in the name of IAC. People can donate in the name of IAC. Arvind's organisation is PCRF (Public Cause Research Foundation)," she said.

After the first meeting of Mr Hazare's new team on Saturday, the group had insisted that they would retain IAC with Ms Bedi saying that it was not Mr Hazare who left the organisation but Arvind Kejriwal-led group which wanted to enter politics.

"They will be announcing the new name of the party. So, it won't be a problem on the name," she said. A press statement issued by the group yesterday said that Mr Hazare reconstituted the Coordination Committee to re-energise India Against Corruption movement, signalling that they were not ready to forgo the name.

Speaking to media, Mr Hazare said the group's bank account will be in the name of Ms Bedi, Sunita Godara and Lt Colonel Brijender Kokhar, all members of the new Coordination Committee.